Talk:Badger
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Badger article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Why are stink badgers included
[edit]They are literally badgers only in name. They are skunks in every other regard. I don't think anyone considers them to actually be a badger. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.127.128.19 (talk) 12:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. the stink badger article notes that DNA work in the 1990s found them more closely related to skunks and moved both out of Mustelidae and into a new family, Mephitidae.
- Janet McConnaughey 2600:1700:4761:1D0:2C65:C149:E093:86C6 (talk) 20:41, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
German translation
[edit]German Article would be the one about "Dachse". Going from that article to its English equivalent "Melinae" redirects to here too. 195.176.112.76 (talk) 08:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class mammal articles
- Mid-importance mammal articles
- C-Class mustelids articles
- Mid-importance mustelids articles
- Mustelids articles
- WikiProject Mammals articles